The Challenge
Invisible to the clients who needed them.
Onal Gallant had a real practice with real results. But their website, built years ago by a generalist developer, had accumulated serious technical problems. Duplicate content across practice area pages. Slow page load. No state-specific authority signals. Two top-3 rankings and 890 monthly visitors, while competitors with weaker operations dominated page 1.
Duplicate Content Crisis
Practice area pages across four states used near-identical copy, triggering Google's duplicate content filters and suppressing rankings across every jurisdiction simultaneously.
No Geographic Authority
The site had no state-specific signals. Google had no clear way to associate Onal Gallant with Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, or Delaware individually, so they ranked for none of them.
72% Bounce Rate
Visitors who found the site left almost immediately. Page load was slow. The UX signaled "generic law firm", not the specialized multi-state expertise the firm actually offered.
The Work
Fixed. Optimized. Ranked. In 5 months.
01 · Technical
Full technical SEO audit & remediation
Identified and fixed 34 technical issues: duplicate title tags, missing canonical tags, broken internal links, slow image loading, and crawl budget waste on paginated archive pages. Technical health score improved from 61 to 94.
02 · Content
Practice area page refresh
Rewrote and differentiated 8 core practice area pages. Each was given unique keyword targeting, state-specific legal context, and schema markup. Added 4 FAQ sections per page targeting long-tail query variants that buyers actually search.
03 · Authority
State-specific citation & authority building
Built separate GBP entries for each active state jurisdiction, created state bar association citations, and secured placements in legal directories (Avvo, Justia, Martindale-Hubbell) with consistent NAP for all four states.
04 · Architecture
Internal linking & content silo restructure
Built a topical content silo connecting practice area pages → state-specific sub-pages → FAQ content. This gave Google clear authority pathways and gave users logical navigation that reduced bounce rate from 72% to 38% in 8 weeks.
The Results
Every metric, before and after.
| Metric | Before | After (5 Months) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic Traffic/Month | 890 | 2,760 | +210% growth |
| Top-3 Google Positions | 2 | 14 | Across 4 state markets |
| Domain Authority | 21 | 38 | Moz DA score |
| Bounce Rate | 72% | 38% | UX + content improvements |
| Avg. Session Duration | 0:58 | 2:34 | Pages/session also doubled |
| Organic Consultations (Q1) | 0 trackable | 37 | First quarter post-engagement |
The Outcome
37 new client consultations from organic in the first quarter after engagement. Each retained client at this firm represents a minimum of $5,000–$40,000 in legal fees, making a single conversion from SEO multiples of the engagement investment. The site continues to compound authority without ongoing agency fees. The infrastructure is owned, not rented.
Related Engagements
More service business results.
Security Services · LA
Joint Power Security
Same infrastructure methodology for an LA security company: invisible on Google to $600K+ in contracts won in 18 months.
Read Case Study →Mental Health · Georgia
BHA Counseling
New practice fully booked in 87 days using local SEO, a from-scratch version of the same authority-building playbook.
Read Case Study →Digital Agency
Zozzah Technologies
Technical SEO + authority content applied to a digital agency, 290% traffic growth and 3 enterprise clients from organic.
Read Case Study →Services Behind the Results
What built this outcome.
SEO Strategy
Technical SEO & search visibility
The technical audit, content architecture, and multi-state authority building that delivered 14 top-3 positions without replacing the website.
See the Service →Conversion Optimization
Website conversion architecture
The internal linking and content silo restructure that cut bounce rate from 72% to 38% and doubled average session duration.
See the Service →Questions About This Engagement
